Independent Software Comparison
Kompass
vs.
wlw (Wer liefert was)

Two directories, two radii

Kompass and wlw answer the same question: who supplies this product? Kompass does it for more than 60 countries with its own classification, wlw for the German-speaking region. Both are directories, and that sets the same limit for both.

The short answer

You are looking for suppliers of a specific product or service in the German-speaking region.

wlw

wlw is built as a supplier search engine for DACH, free for buyers, with several hundred thousand supplier profiles. For the question of who supplies turned parts in Germany, it is the shorter route.

Your suppliers or customers sit in many countries, and you need one product classification that works across borders.

Kompass

Kompass classifies companies by products and services in more than 60 countries. The same category in France, Poland and Italy: wlw cannot do that.

You want to export a company list by product category as a file.

Kompass

With EasyBusiness, Kompass offers its own data product for lists. wlw is a marketplace without an export as a sales list.

You want to approach companies actively and know why they should listen right now.

Neither is built for that

Both show what a company says about itself. Neither decision makers with a role nor dated buying signals sit in a directory, and a supplier's entry is advertising, not research.

Direct Feature Comparison

Strengths and weaknesses based on real user experiences and data architectures.

Kompass

International B2B company directory from Paris, active in more than 60 countries. Companies are ordered by the proprietary Kompass classification for products and services; buyers search for suppliers, companies list themselves.

The greatest strengths

    International breadth: more than 60 countries in one directory, with the same system.
    The Kompass classification orders companies by products and services, finer than an industry code.
    EasyBusiness as a data product: lists by classification, country and size, for procurement and sales.
    Established among buyers who source suppliers across borders.

The weaknesses

    Entries are self-declared. What a company does not list is missing, and what it lists is checked by nobody.
    No signals: no date, no event, no trigger.
    No decision-maker depth: who decides inside the company is not in the entry.
    The German mid-market is patchy. Many of the companies you are looking for never listed themselves there.

wlw (Wer liefert was)

B2B supplier search engine of the Visable group from Berlin with a DACH focus, part of one group with Europages since their combination. Buyers search for products and services free of charge, suppliers pay for visibility.

The greatest strengths

    Find suppliers by product, with great breadth in the German-speaking region: several hundred thousand supplier profiles.
    Free for buyers.
    Search logic built around products and services, not company names.
    Connected to a European counterpart through the group with Europages, if your radius grows.

The weaknesses

    Marketplace logic: profiles are advertising. The supplier pays for visibility, so you first see who pays, not who fits.
    No buying signals. Whether a company is investing right now is in no profile.
    No decision makers. A profile names the company, not the managing director or the head of production.
    No export as a sales list. Anyone who wants to build a call list from wlw types it out by hand.

In-depth market analysis: Who is suitable for what?

The same question, two radii

Kompass and wlw are both directories, and both are built for the buyer's question: who supplies this product? That is the perspective you have to understand first when comparing them. A directory lives on companies wanting to be found. It shows what a company says about itself, ordered by what it offers.

The difference lies in the radius. wlw is the German-speaking region, Kompass is the world, or more precisely: more than 60 countries with the same classification. For the buyer who wants to compare a supplier in northern Italy with one in Saxony, that is a real advantage. For the buyer who only searches in Germany, it is ballast.

Classification: Kompass wins here

The Kompass classification is what sets Kompass apart from an ordinary industry directory. It orders companies not by economic sector but by products and services, and it does so identically in every country. Anyone who needs a list of all manufacturers of hydraulic cylinders in Poland, the Czech Republic and Austria gets it in the same system.

wlw also works with product categories, but the search logic is tailored to DACH procurement and ends at the language border. Through the group with Europages there is a European counterpart, but it is a second directory, not the same one.

DACH breadth: wlw wins here

wlw names several hundred thousand supplier profiles and has been the first port of call for buyers in the German mid-market for decades. Searching is free for buyers. Anyone looking for a turned-parts supplier in Germany finds more candidates in wlw than in Kompass, whose German coverage is patchy because many companies never listed themselves there.

That is no small thing. A directory in which the company you are looking for is missing is worthless for that search, no matter how good the system is.

Lists and export: Kompass has a data product, wlw does not

With EasyBusiness, Kompass offers its own data product: lists by classification, country and size, as a file. Anyone who wants to build a sales list has a route. wlw is a marketplace. There is no export as a sales list, and anyone who wants to build a call list from wlw types out company names and looks up the phone number themselves.

For the buyer's question that does not matter. For the sales question it is the point where wlw drops out.

What both share: self-declaration

Here lies the limit both have in common. A directory entry is self-declared. The company writes what it can do, and on wlw it pays on top for being visible. What a company does not list is missing. What it lists is checked by nobody. That is bearable for a buyer who collects three quotes anyway. For a sales team that uses the list as the basis for first calls, it is the source of most wasted calls: the entry is from 2019, the contact person left long ago, the certification was planned and never came.

Neither directory knows a point in time, either. There is no date, no event, no trigger. Whether a company is building a new hall right now, advertising a role in production or has just obtained a certification is in no entry, neither at Kompass nor at wlw. And both name the company, not the person: the managing director who decides on a change of supplier is not in the directory.

The practical consequence is a calculation that is rarely done. A directory list is cheap per address, but every address then costs the hours in which someone reads the website, looks for the managing director and finds the phone number. Anyone who counts those hours no longer compares the price per row, but the price per conversation actually held. And that depends on who does the research.

The honest recommendation

As a buyer in the German-speaking region, take wlw. As a buyer or sales team with countries beyond the language border, take Kompass, and EasyBusiness for an exportable list. As a sales team that wants to approach German manufacturing companies actively and needs to know what the company actually does, who decides there and why a call fits right now, both are the wrong tool. Not because they are bad, but because they were built for the buyer.

What a buying signal means in this sense is explained in our glossary under buyer signals. Which other databases and directories exist for the German market is shown in our overview of B2B databases for Germany.

The Third Option

Neither Kompass nor wlw (Wer liefert was) fit?

Kodo Leads is not a third directory. For manufacturing companies in the DACH region we read the website and the PDF brochures ourselves: machine park, processes, materials, certifications. Plus the decision makers from the legal notice and dated buying signals with a clickable source. For the market overviews on this website we recorded 2,276 manufacturing and trade businesses and profiled 1,001 of them in depth. 119 of these businesses name an ISO 9001 verbatim, 15 an ISO 14001, 5 an IATF 16949, on their own website, not in a register.

Research instead of self-declaration: what the company can do, we read from its website and brochures, not from a paid entry.
Decision makers from the legal notice and team page: managing directors and authorised officers, with the source.
The trigger is on the card, with date and source: new hall, open role in production, new certification, KfW grant, change of decision maker.
Financials from the company register and federal gazette, with year and source.
Finished list as CSV or straight into Salesforce, no company names to type out.
From 0.70 euros per researched company, single list without a subscription, ten companies free to check.
Discover Kodo Leads

Last updated on