Lusha vs. Apollo
Two Affordable Entries, Two Philosophies
By Benedict Mehlmann, technology and product at Kodo Leads · Last updated
Kodo comes as software (from €290 a month) and as a full service (from €1,790).
Both lower the barrier into the sales-tech world. But one deliberately stays a tool, while the other wants to become your entire outbound system.
Or talk first: Book Joshua
The short answer
- You already run a CRM and outreach setup and only need reliable contact data on top.LushaAs a lean extension, Lusha slots into your existing workflow instead of replacing it, install, open a profile, reveal the contact.
- You are setting up outbound from scratch and want database, email sequences, and calling workflows in one tool.ApolloThe all-in-one approach with an affordable entry covers list building and outreach together, one coherent stack instead of three separate contracts.
- Your team should be productive immediately, without onboarding.LushaThe feature set is deliberately small; where Apollo demands time to learn the platform, Lusha is in use within minutes.
- Your market is the DACH SME segment and you need a buying trigger per company.NeitherBoth databases are international with a US center of gravity, and they deliver contacts, not documented reasons for the conversation.
Direct Feature Comparison
Strengths and weaknesses based on real user experiences and data architectures.
Lusha
The lightweight contact-data tool: a browser extension on a credits model, built for grabbing a target person's email address and phone number fast.
The greatest strengths
- Minimal rollout effort, install the extension and go
- Works directly inside the LinkedIn workflow
- Affordable, predictable entry without a sales call
- Slots into an existing tool stack instead of replacing it
- Connects to common CRM systems for exports
The weaknesses
- Contact data only: no sequence sending, no engagement features
- Credits model, heavy usage makes the tool creepingly more expensive
- Little company intelligence or research depth
- Coverage in the DACH SME segment thinner than for LinkedIn-savvy US audiences
Apollo
The all-in-one outbound platform: a company and contact database plus an engagement layer with email sequences and calling workflows, with a deliberately low entry barrier.
The greatest strengths
- Database, list building, and outreach in a single product
- Affordable entry, accessible even for small teams and founders
- Email sequences and automation built right in
- Extensive filters for building target lists
- One contract instead of several point tools in an early-stage stack
The weaknesses
- Data quality in Europe and DACH is uneven, the database has a US center of gravity
- If you only want data, you pay for platform features anyway
- Feature breadth demands onboarding and ongoing process upkeep
- US vendor: the GDPR assessment of your usage remains your job
Tool or workbench?
Lusha and Apollo are often named in the same breath because both promise an affordable entry into the sales-tech world. Behind that, however, stand two philosophies. Lusha is a tool with one purpose: surface a target person's contact details quickly. Apollo is a workbench: database, list building, email sequences, and calling workflows under one roof. The decision therefore depends less on a price comparison than on how much system you want to buy, and how much you already have.
When Lusha is the better choice
If your sales operation already runs, CRM maintained, outreach process established, then often only one building block is missing: reliable contact data at the moment of research. That is exactly what Lusha is built for. The extension sits on top of the LinkedIn profile, one click reveals email and number, and the credits model keeps the entry manageable. The price of this simplicity: Lusha stays person-centric. Company research, trigger signals, and outreach automation are not its playing field, and with intensive use the credits add up.
When Apollo is the better choice
Apollo targets teams that are setting up or scaling outbound. Instead of buying a database, a sequencing tool, and a dialer separately, you get everything in one interface, at an entry price that works even for founders and small teams. For email-heavy motions at high volume, that is a strong package. The flip side: a platform wants to be operated. Sequences, data hygiene, and processes need attention, and anyone who really only wants contact data pays for features they never open.
The view from the DACH region
For German-speaking B2B teams, a shared limitation comes on top. Both databases are international with a clear US center of gravity: the more LinkedIn-savvy the audience, the better the hit rate, and the thinner it gets at the Swabian machine builder whose decision-makers maintain no profile. The GDPR assessment also remains the customer's job in both cases. And even where the number is correct, the core of first contact is missing: a documented reason why this company should buy right now.
The verdict
You buy Lusha when your system is in place and only contact data is missing. You buy Apollo when you still need the system itself and want a complete outbound setup on a small budget. If, however, you sell complex products to the DACH industrial SME segment, neither database gives you the coverage or the buying trigger, and the signal-based third option deserves a look.
The Third Option
Neither Lusha nor Apollo fit?
Kodo Leads is neither an extension nor an all-in-one platform, but the finished result: signal-based, researched lists for the DACH industrial SME segment. We aggregate technical product data, certificates, commercial register depth, and job ads to provide your sales team with real 'context'. Those who use Kodo already know why they are calling. You get a finished, researched list with a source per lead, no new software, no US data broker.
- Deep website parsing (product PDFs, footers, certificate pages)
- Recognizes need based on industrial machine and process data
- Detects capex signals (supply chain context)
- Commercial register and Bundesanzeiger for DACH depth
- Live buyer signals instead of static industry codes
- GDPR compliant on European infrastructure, source per lead
Further Comparisons
Zoominfo Vs Lusha Apollo Vs Cognism Clay Vs Apollo Cognism Vs Dealfront Kodo vs. Lusha Kodo vs. Apollo All resources
Last updated on
Test us on your area. The first 10 companies are free.
Tell us your postcode area and your target companies. Within 24 hours you have 10 companies, each with occasion, contact and source. No subscription, no credit card.
Prefer to talk first? Talk to Joshua